Looking for a Bolt.new alternative?
Meku and Bolt.new both use AI to accelerate application development, but they are built for very different workflows. This page explains the real differences so you can choose the right platform for building and shipping products in 2026.

Quick Verdict
In short:

Meku is an AI-powered full-stack app and website builder designed to take you from idea to a live application with minimal setup. You describe what you want to build, and Meku generates a structured, deployable codebase covering frontend UI, backend logic, database integration, authentication, and hosting.
Meku is built for founders, startups, and teams that want to ship real software, not just prototypes.
Bolt.new is an AI-powered, browser-native development environment built on StackBlitz’s WebContainers technology. It combines AI code generation with a live in-browser IDE, allowing developers to generate, edit, run, and preview applications entirely in the browser.
Bolt.new emphasizes hands-on coding with AI assistance, rather than abstracting the development process.
This comparison is not about which tool is “more powerful.” It is about how you want to build.
End-to-End Application Generation
You describe the product. Meku generates:
The focus is speed to production.
Browser-Native AI Development
You describe the code. Bolt.new generates:
The focus is developer control and live iteration.
| Capability | Meku | Bolt.new |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Focus | Product delivery and deployment | In-browser development experience |
| Full-Stack App Generation | End-to-end app generation with production intent | Full-stack scaffolding for manual refinement |
| Frontend UI | App-ready UI tied to real user flows | UI generated for rapid iteration |
| Backend APIs | Generated with product logic and workflows | Generated, but requires developer refinement |
| Figma to Code | Yes, design-aware workflows supported | Not supported |
| Database Integration | Supabase with structured schema and app context | Supported via configuration and setup |
| Authentication | Included as part of app generation | Requires manual setup and wiring |
| Hosting & Deployment | Built-in and managed by default | External providers required |
| Infrastructure Management | Abstracted away for speed | Developer-managed |
| Iteration Model | Product refinement through prompts | Live code editing and iteration |
| Architecture Consistency | Higher consistency across changes | Depends on developer decisions |
| Code Ownership | Full export, production handoff ready | Full export via GitHub |
| Browser IDE | Not required | Core experience |
| Best Fit | MVPs, SaaS, internal tools | Developer-first, browser-based workflows |
Both platforms provide full code ownership.
There is no forced vendor lock-in with either tool.
Choose Meku if you are:
Choose Bolt.new if you are:
Some teams:
Prototype or experiment in Bolt.new
Move finalized concepts into Meku
Generate a structured, deployable app
Ship faster with fewer tools
However, for most MVPs, Meku alone is sufficient.
Yes. If you are evaluating Bolt.new alternatives because you want:
Then Meku is the more complete solution.
Bolt.new remains excellent for browser-native development, but it is not optimized for end-to-end product delivery.
If your success depends on launching working software quickly, Meku aligns better with real-world startup and product needs.
Build full-stack applications from a single prompt. Deploy instantly without managing infrastructure. Own your code from day one.
Start building with Meku today.
Also Check: